Comments on: Sanctuary jurisdictions cry “coercion” in legal battle over public safety funds

By: softwarengineer

softwarengineer — Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:20:19 +0000

I’d Also Add the Rich Elite Sanctuary City Types Hate Trump’s Tax Plan

These overpopulation and subsequently over-priced homes have property taxes that exceeds the new tax bill limits….LOL

The rest of us love Trump’s tax plan….

By: USMCM14

USMCM14 — Tue, 24 Jul 2018 01:58:52 +0000

HAHAHA !!!! It’s simple follow federal law or lose federal money no black mail just the law !!!

By: Sanctuary jurisdictions weep “coercion” in legal battle over public safety funds | Business 365

Sat, 21 Jul 2018 22:14:45 +0000

[…] Sanctuary jurisdictions cry “coercion” in legal battle over public safety funds […]

By: Leland

Leland — Sat, 21 Jul 2018 15:57:07 +0000

What a joke. How in the world do you put “public safety at risk”, according to Cuomo, by taking criminals into custody and then deporting them. Nothing we can do about our own criminals born here except jail them at our expense, but to actively work to put the criminals of another country back on our streets defies logic. This stuff is exhibit A to the charge that sanctuary cities care more about illegal alien criminals than American citizens. Kate Steinle died because San Francisco put a five times deported criminal back on the streets.

All this whining about not being awarded money from the feds, and it is federal funds, fails to account for the fact that sanctuary jurisdictions cause federal officials to spend a lot MORE money and more manpower to capture the criminals that are cut loose, and also puts ICE agents at risk. Picking up a criminal illegal at a jail is far safer and cheaper than sending out agents to comb the streets and knock down doors. Notice how quickly the “fringe” idea of abolishing ICE is becoming mainstream among many in the Democratic party. Whatever shiny new toy that comes their way is embraced.

Funny how the left insists that Trump is guilty of treason, but have absolutely no problem with the fact that Obama and Hillary sold 20% of our uranium reserves to the Russians. We diminished our stockpile to build up theirs. Nor is it just Trump who thinks he might have been unfairly targeted for surveillance by the Obama intelligence agencies. Several years ago Obama had to take an angry phone call from Angela Merkel when it was revealed that she and many other world leaders had their private calls intercepted by us. The president of Brazil cancelled a state dinner over it.

By: Bambigg

Bambigg — Sat, 21 Jul 2018 05:40:06 +0000

In reply to Patricia Watkins. so true Pat !!!

By: VivaLaMigra

VivaLaMigra — Sat, 21 Jul 2018 01:12:08 +0000

What a total load of crap! We presume all these AG’s actually studied something called ‘the law’ and would be well aware that law is BY DEFINITION, “coercive!” The laws under which we are governed – that is, coerced by the power of the State – generally say that we MUST do this or must NOT do the other. This is nothing more than an attempt to evade the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. These AG’s are saying that the United States Congress, and the Constitution which created it, are null and void.