Comments on: DACA Recipients Not So DREAMy After All

By: L c

L c — Fri, 05 Jan 2018 02:16:22 +0000

In reply to ChuckB. Why should they give them free University when a lot of people couldn't make payments on a student loan.they have everything and haven't ssacrafised nothing they have housing and snap benefits and much more my family makes one sacfised after another

By: ChuckB

ChuckB — Thu, 04 Jan 2018 20:55:33 +0000

First off, illegals should NEVER be allowed to serve in the US Military. ALL Illegals should be deported when caught. The Absolute Ignorance of the past administration is mind boggling

By: Earl Wayne

Earl Wayne — Thu, 04 Jan 2018 00:02:03 +0000

In reply to NR.

YES!!!! THEY DON’T PAY.
WE THE TAXPAYERS PAY FOR THEM TO GET FREE HOUSING, EBT/FOOD STAMPS, MEDICAL AND TRANSPORTATION.
They send most of any money’s they get to Mexico. 16. Billion for the year of 2017, according to ABC News 01-03-2018.

By: Sadena

Sadena — Wed, 03 Jan 2018 01:08:54 +0000

In reply to Helmut Schnell. IN THR USA THERE IS. If we ever need to have a war and not enouhh are serving they will come a knocking. I worked for the airforce. It still exists its just not like it was before. But there is a draft.

By: jskdn

jskdn — Tue, 02 Jan 2018 22:43:17 +0000

The Migration Policy Institute, pretty much a pro-illegal immigrant organization, but one that has some credibility, did a recent report, “A Profile of Current DACA Recipients by Education, Industry, and Occupation” which provided data and did comparisons the US comparable age population. DACA’s had a small fraction of the college degrees relative to the comparable population and even a bit higher non-school-not working numbers.

There’s a great danger that instead of a legislative DACA replicating the conditions of the Obama’s EO DACA, a much greater amnesty bill will emerge, with little of substance to limit immigration and control illegal immigration. If you take a look at the “bipartisan Senate negotiators” Numbers USA ratings, that fear seems justified: Flake, D 27%, Durbin, F- 1%, Bennet, F- 0%, Graham, F- 0%,Tillis, F- 0%, Lankford, D 27%, Gardner F- 0%.

By: Scott

Scott — Tue, 02 Jan 2018 19:44:54 +0000

Clearly a hate post. How dare you use, like, real numbers and facts. I’m reporting you to the SPLC.